bklynboy, the question is reasonable and your reply is assumptive and not at all helpful. To say that Retained Earnings has nothing to do with cash is just plain incorrect. In the simplest case it MAY simply be cash - you don't know and can't say, without knowing what went into the account (such as cash earnings, depreciation, amortization, etc.) and what came out (dividends, bonuses, etc.). If you are going to respond to a post it would be more helpful if you made more of an effort to be objective, thoughtful and helpful instead of being flippant and not even necessarily correct.
Triest123, Your reply is also not very helpful, at all. The poster indicates that they are a beginner. If you don't have the time to expand upon your explanation then why bother posting at all? And your knowledge of English grammar does not give one much confidence that your knowledge of accounting is any better. (when the goods is received?, to the money is received?). One might suggest that you should "buy a grammar book for further understanding!!!". Being critical of someone who posts a question is arrogant and simply not necessary.
I continue to be amazed and dismayed by people who post replies to valid or reasonable questions but who have nothing useful to contribute to understanding the question or providing an objective answer or explanation. Thumper the rabbit said "If you can't say something nice, don't say nothin' at all!". I would extrapolate this and suggest that "If you can't contribute anything useful to answering or at least shedding more light on the question, don't say nothin' at all". And, yes,, I note that this post is quite old now, however, it still comes up when searching this topic, and strangely enough there is still no useful or well thought out response (including mine at this point, obviously). I will try to find time to provide a proper response in the near future.