U
Uncle Peter
I've got a cheque here from an elderly lady dated Nov 13th 1940. Reckon the bank will accept it?
Peter,
If the check is actually from 1940 it will be rejected as a "stale"
check. The bank teller should have no difficulty recognizing the check as
quite old.
If the date on the check is just an error then it's hard to say whether
the teller will notice the problem. If the teller does, he should reject the
check and advise you to get a new check.
I'd gamble on the teller not noticing the date.
Good luck,
Dave M.
Probably not:I've got a cheque here from an elderly lady dated Nov 13th 1940. Reckon
the bank will accept it?
Given the circumstances described, an alert bank might take this as anShouldn't the teller realise it's a mistake and just accept it? I mean
if the date was 6 months ago, it could be an old cheque, and the person
who wrote it should not be expecting it to be cashed, but clearly this
cheque is not a 1940s cheque, so it's a mistake. We'll see....
Starting by rejecting this cheque, in case she didn't realise what sheGiven the circumstances described, an alert bank might take this as an
indication of dementia and start scrutinising all the lady's
transactions carefully.
If the cheque was for the sum of £20 15s 2p, the bank teller may notice.I've got a cheque here from an elderly lady dated Nov 13th 1940. Reckon
the bank will accept it?
But not if it was for £20 15s 2d presumably.Flop said:If the cheque was for the sum of £20 15s 2p, the bank teller may
notice.
He certainly would since the sum would be £20 15s 2d !If the cheque was for the sum of £20 15s 2p, the bank teller may notice.
I assume "discretionary" includes cheques which have quite obviously been dated wrongly. If the cheque was really from 1940, it would look very old and yellow or tattered, and be of a completely different design.Probably not:
A cheque is valid for as long as the debt between the two parties
(i.e. issuer and payee) exists. In other words, cheques don’t have an
expiration date. However, it is common banking practice to reject
cheques that are over six months old to protect the payer, in case the
payment has been made another way or the cheque may have been lost or
stolen.
She does have dementia or something similar. She's not at all with it. That doesn't mean the bank should have any right to interfere, that's up to her relatives.Given the circumstances described, an alert bank might take this as an
indication of dementia and start scrutinising all the lady's
transactions carefully.
I would only agree if it was a particularly large cheque. Giving her more things to do in an already difficult life is just mean.Starting by rejecting this cheque, in case she didn't realise what she
was doing when she wrote it.
She does often talk in shillings.If the cheque was for the sum of £20 15s 2p, the bank teller may notice.
Um, you're assuming this cheque was written in 1940?!He certainly would since the sum would be £20 15s 2d !
In any case the chances are that the account against which the cheque
was drawn no longer exists. When an account is closed, any cleared
cheques are first honoured from it. Others are referred to drawer.
Cheques are not drawn against banks but the accounts of customers, They
are instructions of a customer to his bank with regard to his account.
The bank will carry them out only if it is in a position to do so.
I've got a cheque here from an elderly lady dated Nov 13th 1940. Reckon the bank will accept it?
I think he meant the *2p* to be *2d*. The *d* being the old imperial money.She does often talk in shillings.
No. The teller should follow the bank's procedures if he wishes to remainShouldn't the teller realise it's a mistake and just accept it?
Also the amount to pay would be in Pounds, Shillings and Pence.I assume "discretionary" includes cheques which have quite obviously
been dated wrongly. If the cheque was really from 1940, it would look
very old and yellow or tattered, and be of a completely different design.
Banks have a duty of care only to accept instructions from people whoShe does have dementia or something similar. She's not at all with it.
That doesn't mean the bank should have any right to interfere, that's up
to her relatives.
They have a duty of care to her and as such will be cautious.She does have dementia or something similar. She's not at all with it.
That doesn't mean the bank should have any right to interfere, that's up
to her relatives.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.