smicker said:
This says nothing about getting only a fraction Richard
http://www.jrf.org.uk/pressroom/releases/170902.asp says amongst
other stuff
More than two years after the implementation of the 1999 Immigration
and Asylum Act, the study found vulnerable asylum seekers were being
denied essential help because of widespread confusion among social
services and other organisations about entitlements. Disabled people
granted refugee status or exceptional leave to remain in Britain have
the same entitlements to benefits as other disabled people. And while
asylum seekers cannot claim disability-related benefits, they are
entitled to an assessment of their community care needs from local
authority social services - and to have those needs met.
Interviews with service providers showed they were rarely familiar
with the full range of disabled refugees’ and asylum seekers’
entitlements. Moreover, service providers had found it difficult to
work with each other and the National Asylum Support Service (NASS).
Financial responsibility for meeting the needs of disabled refugees
and asylum seekers was a major cause of contention, leading to
strained relations. A 2001 court ruling, confirming that local
authorities are responsible for meeting the care needs of disabled
asylum seekers, appeared to have added to the confusion.
Oh, FFS, Smicker, read what you post before you claim it supports you,
will you!
Those granted status are on a par with native Britons. Those still
awaiting decision are not entitled to benefits except through NASS,
which as I have told you provides (about 40%) less than income support.
The second paragraph you have quoted is saying that non-Britons are
getting passed from pillar to post with everyone denying responsibility
for them.
They appear to get it under a different name according to what I
posted above.
Then try reading what you posted above.
If they are having a week of it no one will stay the distance.They
will be bored stiff by the continued reference to asylum seekers.
Oh dear, I really do need to descend to words of one syllable tonight,
don't I?
ONE. NIGHT. NEXT. WEEK.
And those folk get the same benefits and more but under a different
name.
No they do not. They get NASS support at about 60% of income support
levels. They have no entitlement to any other state benefits, but local
authorities still have residual minimal duties to prevent them from
complete destitution, homelessness etc.
[Snip]
Ha gotcha. Errr I think. Folks who are entitled to direct payments and
Independent Living Fund payments, if they are adult children living
with a or both parents cannot pay the parent to be their carer in
situations where carers are not available. Immigrants are allowed
discretion to pay the parents on the grounds that because of religious
and cultural differences they are isolated and cannot get suitable
carers. This discretion is not being used for Brits who are isolated
by location and therefore parents have to give up employment to look
after their child without any income other than the pittance provided.
This is where the discrimination comes in only it is against the Brit
and I didn't read that in any newspaper. ( smug but about to be shot
down by a lawyer of repute)
This is what you keep repeating without evidence in respect of ILF and
has nothing to do with what I was posting about which is carers
allowance. Now please stop repeating this same paragraph time and time
again, or I will be forced to kill you... sorry, killfile you.
I think you will find very few people who use newsgroups actually take
any notice of the BNP and are usually sensible enough to know
propaganda
Except you keep parroting it.
As is illegal immigration, but I see nobody stopping it.
That is what customs officers are supposed to be for, or police to stop
human traffickers.
If I was in
their shoes I would do exactly the same thing. Leave home in the slums
of nowhere and fight like hell to get to the land of handouts. I do
not blame the poor souls who make this attempt to improve their lot in
life. That is not the issue. The issue is that government treats them
better than some of us because everybody is dead scared of being
labeled racist or in fact facing legal proceedings because a false
claim has been made of discrimination.
There you go parroting BNP propaganda again. If you want to do it, fine,
but stop then denying that you are doing it. Or go and join them if your
views are that similar to their policies.
Does it matter who trades in human misery be they qualified or not. It
has been shown to happen on TV. Some obviously are qualified to have a
legal aid franchise.
Yes, which is one of the complaints I have about the Quality Mark.
'