Yikes! This header in your article sums up my quandary well: "
IN A WAY IT'S SIMPLE, IN A WAY IT'S NOT"
I found another great JOA article that also begins on the ominous note of how RPT continue to play a role in Accounting failures and fraud. However, in our case, I am fairly certain that no SPE are involved as with Enron's debacle.
What's a little debt between friends? How to apply accounting rules for related-party transactions.
If you’re like most, you’ve been astonished, disillusioned and angered as you learned of the meteoric rise and fall of Enron Corp. Remember
www.journalofaccountancy.com
From my current understanding, the article's
Type 1 scenario may be applicable. However, the relationship is reversed as Subsidiary is making Note to Parent.
________________________________________________
Type 1: Owner’s Debt Converted to Equity
"One interesting scenario is when an entity converts related-party debt into equity. Preparers might struggle with the issues involved in these transactions because they are not routine and the accounting guidance is slim. In many cases in which an entity has debt outstanding to an owner, and the owner enters into a transaction to convert that debt to equity, the fair value of the equity exchanged does not equal the outstanding balance of the debt. Preparers then must determine whether to recognize a gain or a loss—or some other type of transaction, such as a capital contribution—for the difference between the fair value of the equity and the carrying value of the debt."
___________________________________________________