They're going to get lots and lots of records of transfers to andAlan said:
Stu - on my "to write list" I have an article "Bad Estate Planning" inThey're going to get lots and lots of records of transfers to and
from trusts and from estates. There may be a few gift tax evaders,
but I'd guess they are few.
(Disclaimer - I only agree with Shakespeare regarding lawyers who
practice outside of their expertise. If you, lawyer of Mom, don't know
anything about estate planning, don't practice it, you messed up big time
Yes, I've seen lawyers make all kinds of stupid mistakes like that.JoeTaxpayer said:Stu - on my "to write list" I have an article "Bad Estate
Planning" in which I describe how my mother did just this, a
change of title done by lawyers, transferring her house to my
sister. When I asked if she filed form 709 to claim this in her
tax return, blank stare followed. It was a small enough value
that there would have been no tax due, but of course no step up
in basis on Mom's passing. The bottom line for me is that when
my sister sells the house there will be a tax bill she should
have been able to avoid. So in this case, not so much tax
avoidance, but stupidity leading to a potential $20K tax bill.
Mother and sister both live in it. Both are wiling to ignore my goodIn your case, did your mother keep living in the house? If she did,
it could be argued that technically it was still part of her taxable
estate, thus eligible for stepped up basis.
It's not as bad as it seems. If your mother still lives there (orJoeTaxpayer said:Mother and sister both live in it. Both are wiling to ignore my
good council. I offered the anecdote as an example of bad
planning, I don't have the energy to convince them they are
going to waste a lot of money. I do my sister's taxes, and when
Mom passes, I'm going to have a tough decision to make.
I'll be saving this. This is great news. Which is why I like knowingIt's not as bad as it seems. If your mother still lives there (or
could) when she dies, §2036 says,
It's not as bad as it seems. If your mother still lives there (or
could) when she dies, §2036 says,
"The value of the gross estate shall include the value of all
property to the extent of any interest therein of which the
decedent has at any time made a transfer (except in case of a bona
fide sale for an adequate and full consideration in money or
money's worth), by trust or otherwise, under which he has retained
for his life or for any period not ascertainable without reference
to his death or for any period which does not in fact end before
"(1) the possession or enjoyment of, or the right to the income
from, the property, or
"(2) the right, either alone or in conjunction with any person, to
designate the persons who shall possess or enjoy the property or
the income therefrom."
Then under §1014 says that a recipient gets a stepped up basis
"if by reason thereof the property is required to be included in
determining the value of the decedent's gross estate under chapter
11 of subtitle B...."
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
|IRS vs Tax Court methods||3|
|IRS Revisiting a Tax Court Decision||11|
|Tax Shelters: Courts 3 IRS 0||0|
|Property asking prices to rise by 59%......||9|
|USA Releasing client records to new accounting firm||3|
|Supreme Court Rules For IRS||26|
|Update -- was Re: What to ask when viewing investment property(Warehouse)||0|
|court decision on IRS RTRP authority challenge||4|