Non-profit math?

Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure if I'm doing the math correctly (am I using the right formula?)

I have a at-home tiny non-profit "business". All proceeds go to charity.

All supplies come out of my own pocket, or from sales. However, I do want to break even at least most of the time. Hence, "proceeds".

That being said, the way that I was calculating it was simply the Owner Contributions minus Owner Withdraws, then once I "break even" at 0, everything goes to charity.

However, this just didn't seem right. Because I didn't take into account the sales. Now I'm wondering if I owe the charity (morally speaking), which I will pay if it's the case...

So this is the new formula that makes sense to me:

Sales - (Owner Contribution - Owner Withdraw) - Donations already donated.

So for example, I'll use math friendly numbers.

If I have $100 in sales, bought $75 in supplies out of my own pocket, was reimbursed $50 of that, and have already donated $20, this is my NEW equation:

$100 - ($75 - $50) - $20 =
$100 - $25 - $20 = $55 still owed to charity

Compared to the OLD equation:
($75 - $50) = $25 owed to me

However, with my new equation, I'm not breaking even either!

I might even be wrong on BOTH of these. Please, if you could, help me. I've tried to find the answer (seems like it would be a common question), but I've found nothing helpful.

Thanks
 
Joined
Dec 23, 2010
Messages
82
Reaction score
12
Multiple ways to handle it, but one "formulaic" way (such as you're attempting) that doesn't use some form of double-entry accounting, uses two formulas. First some notation...

OTC: Owed To Charity
OTO: Owed To Owner
OE: Owner Expenditures (amounts you've spent out of your own pocket).
OR: Owner Reimbursements (amounts you've been reimbursed for out-of-pockets).
S: Sales
D: Donations turned over to the charity.

Then the two formulas:
OTC = S - OE - D
OTO = OE - OR


This assumes that you always use cumulative amounts for the variables. The sum of these two amounts at any given moment (OTC + OTO) should always equal the balance in the checking account.

Using your illustrative numbers (Sales to date = 100; OE to date = 75; OR to date = 50; and D to date = 20), the formulas give...
OTC = 100 - 75 - 20 = 5
OTO = 75 - 50 = 25

And the sum (30) agrees with what should be presently in the account: Sales (100) less the reimbursements (50) and less the donations (20).
 

Triest123

VIP Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
269
Reaction score
51
I'm not sure if I'm doing the math correctly (am I using the right formula?)

I have a at-home tiny non-profit "business". All proceeds go to charity.

Thanks

$100 - ($75 - $50) - $20
$100 - $25 - $20 = $55 still owed to charity


=> Your calculation is wrong, as you only consider the cost of the supplies is $25 only.
In other words, the supplies is partly subsidized by you for $50.

Actually, you owe to charity is $5 only.

See this simple calcuation

Sales - Cost of Supplies - Donation = Profit (owed to charity)
100 - 75 - 20 = $5

The supplies is paid by you personally, the company's cash position is

Sales proceeds $100
Less : Donation ($20)
Reimbursements ($50)=> the partial payment of supplies
Cash in hand $30
Less : Owed to Owner ($25)=> the balance payment of supplies
Net cash balance $5=> own to charity
 
Last edited:

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top