K
Keith
Advice please.
In public practice (viz. audit certificated, etc.) it is usual and
reasonable to
insure one's activity against legal claim.
Notwithstanding that.... the caveats which now accompany a set of
'audited
accounts' are so bulletproof that the shareholders would need to launch
a
£100million claim to get a sniff of satisfaction.. and without
malfeasance such
claim would fail. Allegedly.
Usually, such claim would be on the basis of error/incompetence/
lack of supervision, et al.
As one who is no longer involved (thankfully) in this chase-the-nugget
contest can I ask on what basis the professional indemnity risk is
currently calculated?
On what basis are the 'professional indemnity' insurance premiums based?
Is it a percentage of turnover? Number of clients? "Newness" to the
profession?
TIA
In public practice (viz. audit certificated, etc.) it is usual and
reasonable to
insure one's activity against legal claim.
Notwithstanding that.... the caveats which now accompany a set of
'audited
accounts' are so bulletproof that the shareholders would need to launch
a
£100million claim to get a sniff of satisfaction.. and without
malfeasance such
claim would fail. Allegedly.
Usually, such claim would be on the basis of error/incompetence/
lack of supervision, et al.
As one who is no longer involved (thankfully) in this chase-the-nugget
contest can I ask on what basis the professional indemnity risk is
currently calculated?
On what basis are the 'professional indemnity' insurance premiums based?
Is it a percentage of turnover? Number of clients? "Newness" to the
profession?
TIA