Valuation of movable property

Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In the literature and within the regulation set up by the IVSC (international valuation standards counsil) it is quite clear how to appraise real estate (for example with the aim of getting a loan). Less clear is the valuation and the regulation of the valuation for movable property (like machinery). And because accountants need to be transparant on every value on a balance sheet it is important to start the dialogue.

It is clear that in the valuation of real estate and movable property the income, cost and market approach are accepted. But in case of movable property some uncertainty appears. I will try to make this clear.

In case market references are available it is recommended to use the market approach. This approach is the most used and most clear method. But in case no market references are available of movable property (for example a nuclear reactor barrel) the market approach can not be used and the cost approach (depriciated replacement cost) is recommended.

In order to calculate the fair market value with DRC method the replacement cost new / reproduction cost new needs to be calculated, after doing this the depreciation (based on physical, economic and functional obsolescence) needs to be deducted. However how do you determine the depreciation of a nuclear reactor barrel?

1. Is it within the accountancy accepted to determine the physical detoriation on the base of a linear line, a diminishing value or an Iowa curve (s-curve)?

2. Is it accepted to use the cost-to-capacity method to calculate the functional and economic obsolescence of movable property?

3. Is it accepted to use standardized tax models used for the depriciation to determine the economic life of movable property?
 

Fidget

VIP Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2013
Messages
754
Reaction score
139
Country
United Kingdom
Acceptable depreciation policies are quite straightforward in many cases. It becomes trickier with specialised assets where there is limited, or even nothing to benchmark against. In those cases, if the reasoning behind the depreciation policy is sound, then it should be ok subject to annual review.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top