UK "Making the Financial Statements look better" UK Law

Sep 9, 2019
Reaction score
United Kingdom
To make the financial statements of a company look better- when does this cross the line into Practices that run the risk of erroneous accounting at best?

Interesting q in this day and age IMO- and the company is run by a private individual so no loss potentially but...

In particular, note the following sections:

"We, we do that, because to make er the financial statement look better"!

"So, the way I do it just make the financial statement stronger".
Interested to know, where is the line between acceptable improvement of figures and accounting that is erroneous at best! His English is not the best, worth watching the clip certainly.

You could write a book on Financial practices in the 2nd Tier of English football in recent years tbh...



VIP Member
Jan 6, 2013
Reaction score
United Kingdom
To be fair, he's just being rather open about what most organisations are doing (EFL's rules asides), in structuring operations in order to present healthy financial statements to stakeholders. There's nothing wrong with doing that (in fact, I think there'd be something wrong if an organsiation wasn't doing that) so long as relevant accounting standards and any applicable laws are being correctly applied, and of course, is it ethical to do whatever it is even if it's allowed under accounting standards/law.

The fine line is crossing into the realms of creative accounting to present financial statements in the way you want them, outright deceit and a smattering of the aforementioned ethics.

In this case, the accounting treatment of the transaction is correct, but the bone of contention was the date that the sale agreement became irrevocable - which is more a point of law. As it turns out, that date was after the year end, so the sale should not have been accounted for in the 2017/18 accounts.

You've probably seen this, but just in case you haven't - it's a link to the proceedings of the charges made against SW by EFL. It puts a lot more context to what actually happened. The gist of it is that the charge that the sale was booked in the wrong accounting period was upheld, but the charge that sale date had been deliberately backdated was dismissed.

On the point of a book about football finances... I won such a thing in a book giveaway a few months back: Kieran Maguire - The price of football. Put my name in the hat for a random draw, and that's what I got. If you want it, just ping me a message with an address to send it to and I'll stick in the post.

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question