I recently inherited a client when his accountant passed away in the middle of tax season. It turns out this guy was charging this client $500 a month for work he wasn't doing and I'm still scratching my head as to how he did their individual tax returns before the corporate returns (no dividend reported). Anyway, as I dug deeper, it turns out this last accountant was just making up numbers. The net income of the corporation was understated by up to 99% (not kidding) since 2011, which of course means that the tax liability was also significantly understated. This guy broke every code of conduct and ethics you can think of. I have informed the clients of the understatement and have advised them to amend their past tax returns. They were quite shocked as they had relied heavily on this accountant's advice. Refiling means that they are going to owe a lot more in corporate and personal taxes than they can afford to pay and screw up the FASFA for their four college bound children. As a result, they have chosen not to amend the previous year's taxes, but to move forward, making sure all future taxes are accurate. I'm torn. These people technically did nothing wrong, but now they know about the problem, so not amending is really tax evasion at this point. The question is, based on the code of Ethics, do I continue a relationship with them? Do I work with them on the future tax returns? Under any other circumstances, I would part ways, but I really feel bad for these people. I have never seen such a complete and total breach of trust. Discussion, please!!!